Participatory monitoring and evaluation guidelines experiences in the field : St Vincent and the Grenadines by Katja Jobes

Cover of: Participatory monitoring and evaluation guidelines | Katja Jobes

Published by Great Britain, Department for International Development, Social Development Division in London .

Written in English

Read online

Edition Notes

Book details

StatementKatja Jobes.
SeriesDepartment for International Development Social Development Division Dissemination Note -- no.1
ContributionsGreat Britain. Department for International Development. Social Development Department.
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL18363606M

Download Participatory monitoring and evaluation guidelines

This book offers a complete package for participatory monitoring and evaluation. The suggested tools for both qualitative (to know how and why of the project implementation) and quantitative methods (to know what, who, where, how many, how much of a phenomenon), pass the test of internal and external validity of the evaluation : M.

Chandre Gowda. guidance paper explores how a Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation (PM&E) process can enhance participation, empowerment and governance in World Bank-supported projects and programs, which enhances the performance, efficiency and sustainability of interventions.

Participatory monitoring and evaluation (PM&E) is a process of self-assessment, collective knowledge generation, and cooperative action in which stakeholders in a. This manual is prepared in cook book fashion with easily followed instructions for 26 participatory monitoring tools to allow use by both local field staff acting as facilitators and directly by community members engaged in the evaluation process.

Page 4 of 32 Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation How to Guide for Focus Group Discussions (Can be adapted for age groups 5 upwards) Preparation: The tasks in organising a focus group are: Clarify the purpose and questions to ask.

Think about the number of focus groups you might want to run. Decide on and invite participants. Make sure you send invites to File Size: 2MB. in Februaryto develop a participatory monitoring and evaluation (PM&E) framework for local and commu- nity-based adaptation.

The resulting framework is a Monitoring, Evaluation, Reflection & Learning (MERL) toolFile Size: 1MB. Keywords: participatory monitoring and evaluation, NGOs, CSOs, Central Asia. Part One Introduction.

Participation in development is generally accepted as a process that is fundamental to addressing issues of ownership and sustainability. Everyone acknowledges the value of participation.

• Participatory Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation of Biodiversity (PAMEB) – Participatory monitoring, assess-ment and evaluation of biodiversity involves data collection and analysis performed with and by non-scientists for the purpose of understanding species or ecosystem diversity (Lawrence and Ambrose-Oji ).

Monitoring and evaluation can help an organization extract relevant informationfrompastandongoingactivitiesthatcanbeusedasthebasisforprogram - maticfine-tuning,teffectiveplanning.

While monitoring provides records of activities and results, and signals problems to be remedied along the way, it is descriptive and may not be able to explain why a particular problem has arisen, or why a particular outcome has occurred or failed to occur.

Evaluation deals with questions of cause and effect. Guidelines for Programme Design, Monitoring and Evaluation Table of contents KEY TERMS 1. BASIC PRINCIPLES Development cooperation as part of foreign policy • Increasing coordination and coherence • Strategic planning sets the framework • Cooperation has various forms • Policies require actionFile Size: KB.

Learning from Change provides an overview of the common themes and experiences in Participatory monitoring and evaluation guidelines book approaches to monitoring and evaluation across different institutions and sectors.

It explores conceptual, methodological, institutional and policy issues which need to be addressed in order to enrich our understanding and practice of Participatory. PLA Notes Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation. and Toddlers participation participatory approaches Participatory Learning participatory methodologies participatory methods participatory monitoring participatory planning Participatory Rural Appraisal Philippines PLA Notes PM&E practitioners PLA Notes Participatory Monitoring.

PM&E, CED Evaluation in Rural Development, 10/28/14 References •Adams, J. and A. Garbutt, Participatory monitoring and evaluation in practice: Lessons learnt from Central Asia. Praxis Paper Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation in Practice.

International NGO Training and Research Center. Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation of Community Projects Paperback – January 1, Participatory monitoring and evaluation guidelines book Francis W.

Mulwa (Author), Adelina Mwau (Foreword) See all formats and editions Hide other formats and editions. Price New from Used from Author: Francis W.

Mulwa. report1 researched the participatory monitoring and evaluation literature and concluded that EHP should develop a participatory monitoring methodology for use in WSH projects and relevant training materials for field Size: KB. The implementation of evaluation recommendations, if so desired by the designers of the system, can be organized by linking it to the budget.

In Chile, the budget offi ce maintains a record of all recommendations made in evalu- ations and follows them up annually in the budget negotiations for each pro- Size: 4MB.

Request PDF | Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation for Projects, Programmes or Policies | This book is about participatory monitoring and evaluation. It. Evaluation Models, Approaches, and Designs.

BACKGROUND. This section includes activities that address • Understanding and selecting evaluation models and approaches • Understanding and selecting evaluation designs The following information is provided as a brief introduction to the topics covered in these activities.

Notes on Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation (draft). Development Study Unit, University of Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden. This study explores the failures of development within three paradigms: modernization, dependency, and modes of production.

Participatory monitoring. involves local beneficiaries in measuring, recording, collecting, processing and communicating information to assist local development project extension workers and local group members in decision-making.

Participatory evaluation. assists in adjusting and redefining objectives, reorganizingFile Size: 1MB. Marina Apgar – Marina uses evaluation research to fuel collaborative learning about social change, with an emphasis on participatory approaches she accompanies development and humanitarian organisations as they build, test and improve complexity aware monitoring and evaluation systems.

The Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) System Assessment Tool (SAT) is a generic tool developed as a diagnostic exercise for programs and projects to critically examine their M&E systems, identify areas performing well and critical gaps, and develop a quality improvement plan to maintain strengths and overcome weaknesses in their M&E system.

guidelines (e.g. PEPFAR) Facilitation skills Data auditing skills/experiences Intermediate to advanced knowledge of program monitoring and evaluation Experience in managing, overseeing or providing technical assistance to a program M&E system Knowledge/experience with the similar type of program is an advantage 5.

The Participatory Performance Tracker (PPT) is a participatory self-assessment tool that allows farmers belonging to a Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning Tools. Participatory Performance Tracker (PPT) Tool: Self-Assessment FFBS TOOLKIT Tracking Sheet has two parts, monitoring different practices at different times of the season.

Abstract: The second edition of the Impact Evaluation in Practice handbook is a comprehensive and accessible introduction to impact evaluation for policy makers and development practitioners. First published init has been used widely across the development and academic communities.

The book incorporates real-world examples to present practical guidelines for. Participatory Evaluation. Participatory evaluation can help improve program performance by (1) involving key stakeholders in evaluation design and decision making, (2) acknowledging and addressing asymmetrical levels of power and voice among stakeholders, (3) using multiple and varied methods, (4) having an action component so that evaluation.

Participatory monitoring (also known as collaborative monitoring, community-based monitoring, locally based monitoring, or volunteer monitoring) is the regular collection of measurements or other kinds of data, usually of natural resources and biodiversity, undertaken by local residents of the monitored area, who rely on local natural resources and thus have more local knowledge.

The first part of the book provides a general discussion of participatory extension in the form of step-by-step guidelines that follow the stages of the ôextension cycleö: situation analysis, planning, implementation, as well as monitoring and evaluation.

The book then considers in greater detail the application of participatory extension as part of ZambiaÆs ôNational. The participatory evaluation process.

How participatory evaluation works, its goals, the roles people may play in the process, what to expect. Meeting skills. Following discussion, listening skills, handling disagreement or conflict, contributing and responding appropriately, general ground rules and etiquette, etc.

Interviewing. Putting people. General guidelines and tips for participatory methods 17 Comparative chartfor participatory methods 25 Charrette 27 Citizens Jury 37 Consensus Conference 57 Delphi 75 ExpertPanel 87 Focus group 97 Participatory Assessment,Monitoring and Evaluation Planning cell Scenarios The World Café Brief descriptions of methods and File Size: 1MB.

Africa's Public Service Delivery & Performance Review is a peer reviewed journal, aimed at the promotion and sharing of knowledge, skills and innovations in government and the wider Public-Sector environment in South Africa and abroad. With a multi-disciplinary outlook, the journal will stimulate service delivery and performance challenges being faced in by: 5.

experiences. Many of the traditional monitoring and evaluation methods and tools have been adapted to be more participatory.

The result is "The Community's Toolbox". The manual is organized into Three Sections. Section One introduces the idea, and benefits to be gained from a new approach.

This section also provides some two-way. Participatory monitoring and evaluation (PM&E) is a process through which stakeholders at various levels engage in monitoring or evaluating a particular project, share control over the content, the process and the results of the M&E activity and engage in taking or identifying.

Guidelines and methodologies of evaluation: Nov Monitoring and Evaluation guidelines: private sector projects funded by AfDB: Dec Co-operation with Civil Society Organizations; Policy & guidelines: Sept Asian Development Bank. Revised Guidelines for the Preparation of Country Assistance Program Evaluations: December Participatory evaluation is an approach to program provides for the active involvement of stakeholder in the program: providers, partners, beneficiaries, and any other interested parties.

All involved decide how to frame the questions used to evaluate the program, and all decide how to measure outcomes and is often used in international. With more and more opportunities to promote broad-based participation in development, there is increased recognition that monitoring and evaluation should also be participatory.

This paper presents a literature review of experiences in participatory monitoring and evaluation (PM & E) from around the world, used in differing contexts and involving all kinds of stakeholders.

Guidelines: participatory planning, monitoring and evaluation of multi-stakeholder platforms in integrated landscape initiatives. Working paper. Wageningen, the Netherlands: Tropenbos International and EcoAgriculture Partners.

Authors: Koen Kusters¹, Maartje de Graaf¹ and Louise Buck² ¹ Tropenbos International, Wageningen, the Netherlands. uptake of Monitoring and Evaluation. Several studies have though established that in order for Monitoring and Evaluation to be effective it should be inclusive. The effects of Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation (PM&E) have enabled the government to improve on service delivery, however, with limited Size: KB.

A participatory impact assessment approach was used to evaluate the Northern Region Rural Integrated Programme (NORRIP) in Northern Ghana. It assessed the impact of local capacity building on access to improved water supply and sanitation services by using an evaluation framework known as the Village Development Capacity Index (VDCI).

Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation (PM&E) Key features of PM&E • PM&E aims to empower local people • Community members are fully involved in the process • Community members identify their own indicators of success • Methods are simple, open, with immediate sharing of results • PM&E is built in from the start of a project • PM&E is flexible to fit the local .Definition and purpose of participatory monitoring and evaluation Integrating participation in monitoring and evaluation.

Marisol Estrella notes that interest in participatory monitoring and evaluation (PM&E) developed due to the international development community’s dissatisfaction with conventional approaches to.Participatory Learning and Action ; Monitoring and Evaluation and Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation book.

Read reviews from world’s largest communi 5/5(4).

40756 views Saturday, November 14, 2020